PLANET Magazine
Marisa Olson, Fall 2003-10-20
|
The year is 1952. Seven years have passed since Hitler
committed suicide, effectively ending the Second World War. We are in the
cradle of the atomic age. The US has 1,005 stockpiled nuclear weapons, the
USSR, 50. It's Halloween and over 11,000 U.S. military personnel are suiting
up at the Marshall Islands' Enewetak Atoll in the South Pacific. They are
about to detonate "Mike," the very first high-yield two-stage
thermonuclear device. It is not an exaggeration to say that nuclear weapons
have changed our world, for on that day, 50 years ago, a handful of
politicians briefly added a another sun to our universe. Experimentally
releasing the energy of 10.4 million tons of TNT, "Mike" exceeded
the firepower of all weapons detonated in World War I and II, combined, and
operated on the same energy principal as the stars. Artist Michael Light's newest project gathers 100 of
these nuclear "suns", or small stars - "thermonuclear
furnaces", as Light calls them -- in a book to be released in five
languages this October, with Knopf publishing the American edition. Half of
the images are of tests taking place on land, while half are over water. None
of the images in Light's book were taken by the photographer whose name is
listed as its author. As with the artist's high-profile FULL MOON project, in
which he made use of NASA public domain images from Apollo, 100 SUNS is the
fruit of Light's creative appropriation of existing images. The images were taken mostly by military personnel
stationed at the Hollywood-based Lookout Mountain Air Force Station. These
documentarians had, at their disposal, a show-biz arsenal of cameras and
equipment. Light has reproduced the images with faithful accuracy, choosing
not to edit or "touch-up" the images, thus preserving the perspective
of the photographer. The resulting byproduct is a visual timeline of the
mutual evolution of photographic and nuclear technologies. The photos got
better as the bomb got bigger. And, of course, the photos were quickly and
widely accessible, in the heat of a Cold War that led the US to rapidly
declassify images that would demonstrate its firepower to the world. Not
surprisingly, the tests had a reciprocal effect on Hollywood. In fact, Light's project is laden with filmic
references. Let us not forget that a "photo-graph" is a
"light-drawing", so that presenting photos of the light of the
"suns" is, therefore a self-reflexive meta-level practice a light
drawing of a light-impression. The images in the book are laid out to read
almost as a film strip, each image existing as part of a larger series. Given
a specific sequence, Light expands the story from one frame to the next,
land-based version giving way to water-world sequels. Image 37,
"Zucchini", establishes the quasi-cinematic field in which the
tests took place. Rows of bleachers find members of the Canadian and British
military observing a detonation 13 miles away. The image of the eager men,
lined up in awe, bespectacled in darkened shades, bears a striking
resemblance to images of theatre-goers of the same age, perhaps donning 3-D
glasses in order to best capture the sci-fi "masterpiece"
illuminated before them. Indeed, the best filmic reference may not be to science
fiction for the action flick, but to porn. The military gave their bombs
names like "Fox," "Sugar," "Romeo," and
"Climax" (part of "Operation Upshot-Knothole," a June
1953 fission bomb test orchestrated at 1,334 feet above a Nevada desert,
creating a fireball with a life span six times longer than its predecessors
and an invisible blast of heat that set the earth ablaze five miles away).
The grins smeared on the faces of the men in "Zucchini" come as a
result of witnessing a mind-blowing demonstration of earth-shattering
prowess. A less-than-visceral response would be impossible. These men knew
then what Hollywood knows now war is sexy, bombs are radiant, nuclear
technology is smashing. But if 100 SUNS is as much a film as a book, its
relationship with porn extends to a similarity in effect. What might once
have made a shutter shudder now verges on optical populism. Eventually the
viewer moves beyond shock, to a state of visual overload. The climax here is
no petit mort (France's "small death" of the orgasm) but the
ultimate realization that we are witnessing traces of the technology that yielded
hundreds of thousands of dead, in Japan, and multiple generations of genetic
deformity, as seen at Chernobyl. Light says that it's not uncommon for him to
receive a call the morning after someone sees the work, saying that they have
experienced nightmares after witnessing the "brilliant human
savagery" therein. In a bittersweet way, this points to a fact on which
the book's brilliance hinges. We are witnessing the sublime. The tests, and
the resulting images, are simultaneously beautiful and horrific, hedonistic
and pestilent. It might seem easy to draw parallels between the subject
of 100 SUNS and the contemporary political climate. After all, we now live in
a world in which the letters WMD can stand alone, easily recognized as an
acronym for weapons of mass destruction. Nevertheless, the experiments in 100
SUNS unfolded largely in a time of "peace," when the US was not
embroiled in a war. Some argue that it is precisely the existence of nuclear
weapons that made that peace possible. The USSR stopped its tests in 1990 (13
months prior to its dissolution) and the US claims to have followed suit just
two years later, just after the first Iraq war. But such an argument for
nuclear weapons might call upon us to rethink our definition of
"peace," however -- for the absence of an officially declared war
is not peace, and the US has been entrenched in non-war "police
actions" nearly every year since World War II ended. This is to say
nothing of the violent impacts of our homeland nuclear experiments, both
offshore and on the continental United States. After years of protest,
thousands of Nevada, Utah and Marshall Islands residents are quietly
receiving government-inked checks meant to soften the blow of their fallout
cancers and medical quandaries. And there is so much more of which we are
surely unaware. This is one of the motives for Light's project.
"One cannot help but wonder what, as citizens, we still do not know
about the subject of nuclear weapons, not only in the sense of the surreal
excesses of the Cold War past, but in terms of the hidden, weaponized nuclear
present that will be with us as long as we know time," he says. Light
has returned to Bikini Atoll, currently uninhabitable due to radioactive
contamination, to take new aerial images of the spaces in which the suns
erupted, "with the conceit of being there as a witness in the 1950s and
imaging the bomb myself as a photographer." He is also at work editing
underwater footage taken at Bikini. The video, aerial photos and reprints of
the archival images will be presented in an exhibition at San Franciscošs
Hosfelt Gallery opening October 18 and running through November 27, and plans
are underway to tour the work. While it is only fitting that the verite of virtuoso
destruction be captured by the "faithful" eye of the camera,
ultimately, Light admits, seeing is not knowing. "Photographs only tell
us about the surface of things, about how things look. When it's all we have,
however, it's enough to help understanding. It exists. It happened. It is
happening. May no further nuclear detonation photographs be made, ever." Š PLANET magazine, Fall 2003, All Rights Reserved |